Fujifilm FinePix A600
Editors' rating
Good
6.2
out of 10
- The good: Responsive; decent photos.
- The bad: Stiff, awkward controls; very few features.
- The bottom line: The Fujifilm FinePix A600 produces nice images, though its awkward design and mundane features hold it back.
- Reviewed by:
- Will Greenwald
- Review date: 11/6/06

The A600's blocky body manages to be both unimpressive and awkward to use. A stiff zoom rocker and the two buttons on either side of it are the camera's primary controls. Besides zooming and activating flash/macro, the buttons serve as an uncomfortable control pad for navigating the A600's sparse menu system. The rocker is located in the top-right corner of the camera's back panel, while the actual Menu/OK and Back buttons sit in the lower right, making the simplest activities a thumb-stretching chore.
As a budget point-and-shoot, the A600's features don't exactly stand out. The 6-megapixel Fujifilm SuperCCD sensor is complemented by a mundane 36m-to-108mm-equivalent lens. It lacks image stabilization, so the most you can do for low-light or high-speed shooting is turn on the flash and bump the sensitivity up to its maximum of ISO 400. The camera includes an anemic video mode that records QVGA (320 x 240) footage at 10fps, little better than most camera phones' video modes. It also includes 12MB of internal memory for shooting without an xD memory card. However, 12MB will get you only seven full-resolution shots at best, so a memory card is still highly recommended.
Despite its low-end status, the A600 displayed decent performance. After taking 2.7 seconds from power-on to first shot, we managed to take a shot every 3.1 seconds thereafter without flash. With the onboard flash enabled, that time increased to a more disappointing 5.8 seconds. The shutter release responded quickly, lagging only 0.7 second between button-press and shot. The camera's burst mode could handle only three shots at a time, but it managed to take those shots in just 2.2 seconds, for a rate of 1.4fps.
The A600's images turned out well, though they were hardly perfect. Fine details in our test shots were softened by numerous compression artifacts and heavy fringing on the edges of bright white objects. Despite these flaws, the photos looked good, with even exposure and accurately reproduced colors.
Though its images satisfied, the Fujifilm FinePix A600's design left a lot to be desired and its wake-up and shot-to-shot times could have been faster. Between its clunky body and awkward control scheme, the A600 simply isn't very fun or easy to use. If you're looking for a simple, attractive, inexpensive camera, you might consider the Olympus FE-190 instead, though it doesn't include a continuous shooting mode. If you're looking for a budget point-and-shoot with strong manual features, consider the Canon PowerShot A540. The two cameras are quite different from each other, but each vastly improves upon the A600's flaws.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
| Typical shot-to-shot time | Time to first shot | Shutter lag (typical) |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
| Typical continuous-shooting speed |
Buying choices
for Fujifilm FinePix A600 from online stores:
This product is currently not in stock at any of our online merchants.
Special sponsor stores
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
- Marc Canter: The master of multimedia speaks
-
In this Super Techies interview, larger-than-life techie Marc Canter talks with ZDNet's Editor in Chief Dan Farber about his career as a multimedia pioneer.
- Watch the video >>
- FREE Economist Report available at the Collaboration Resource Center.
-
"Collaboration: Transforming the Way Business Works", a new study from the Economist Intelligence Unit. Find this informative report along with free videos podcasts and more, availibe courtesy of Cisco.
- Sign in now to download!
- New entries posted to Know Issues, Best Practices and Workarounds Wiki
-
Latest Topics: Running virtual machines and DHCP can cause Intel® AMT to be inaccessible; Wildcard certificates are currently not supported for remote; Dell 755 returns a duplicate UUID during activation configuration.
- See the latest entries on the Intel Wiki >>




